Hey, it’s a random thought blog entry! Originality, thy name is me!
I was thinking that instead of having SCUBA equipment and masks and whatnot, there should be a way to use the technology of the hydrolysis battery to power a device that would split the water into its component atoms. Then, the mask could me small and self-contained, run on hydrogen (underwater this wouldn’t be dangerous) and get you high on oxygen all at once! Maybe there could be a nitrogen mixer or something to keep it from being too much O2 or to somehow decrease the likelihood of youe getting the bends? I don’t know. I’m not the science guy.
—
A friend of mine defended the war in Iraq admirably (nope, not Bjorn this time) over the weekend. He’s a teacher, so don’t go hatin’. He ain’t no Bush-lover. But in the tactical sense – the Sun Tzu sense – he had a point. If you want to fight a war against terrorists, do you kill the one man who accomplished a terrorist attack on American soil of a scale never before seen? Or do you fight the war right up to his door and hold him there, so he never gets to be a martyr? The second course of action assures that another holy war will not be taken up in his name.
Then, when you’ve cornered your enemy in such a way, you move the war to another front. A front which includes a dictator that no one loves, not even most of his countrymen. You set up shop there. And you dig in. Then, instead of going through all the trouble of getting through American security and flying across the ocean, every crazed person in that part of the world can drive a Jeep 300 miles and get a piece of their Great Infidel. And their innocent citizens die in the crossfire, not ours. And their country runs out of resources, not ours.
Humanitarian, agreeable, acceptable? I think not. But cunning and effective? Well, it’s a better defense than I’ve heard from the government for this bullshit war.
—
I’m going on a diet. I’ve read the facts, I’m reading the book, and I’m not going crazy with it. But I’m taking on the South Beach thing. Thus far, the thing I’ll miss the most is ice cream, but it says I can have some once in a while. And since I’m doing this mostly to not end up with heart disease or diabetes, the diet seems to have its head in the right game. The fact that I will be truly irresistible to the ladies is an added benefit.
—
I had a drop of honey on a banana for a snack when I got home from work and noticed that the bear has a warning to not feed honey to infants. I had to know why, so I looked it up. You benefit from my obsession with knowledge, if you read my site. But you don’t. And it’s so disheartening. You’re breaking my goddamn heart. Anyway, honey according to wikibooks:
Honey (as well as other sweeteners) is also potentially extremely dangerous for infants. This is because botulism spores are among the few bacteria that survive in honey. While these spores are harmless to adults, an infant’s digestive system is not yet developed enough to destroy them and the spores could potentially cause infant botulism. For this reason, it is advised that neither honey, nor any other sweetener, should be given to children under the age of 18 months.
Apparently, you have to use clover as well, or the honey can be poisonous, particularly from azalia bushes. And, in addition, beekeepers completely rule. Think about it. They have to be cool, they freaking keep. Bees.